- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 20:09:01 +0100
- To: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 6 April 2014 18:36, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > Your thoughts welcomed on the idea of adding a workperformedEvent property. > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/workPerformedEvent Apologies, I meant to write and link: https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/workPerformed rather than workPerformedEvent. This is a link *from* an Event to a CreativeWork. Also - I was just chatting with Richard Wallis about this and the bibextend work. What I want to do next to move those along is bundle together (for broad consistency review) a few culture/bibliographic related proposals into a single test build. This doesn't mean they all need to be added at same time or 100% integrated, but should help flag up any obvious problems. I've made a test build using the new codebase that has the Periodicals etc proposal plus this workPerformed proposal plus VisualArtwork, available as http://sdo-culture-bundle.appspot.com/PublicationVolume http://sdo-culture-bundle.appspot.com/Periodical http://sdo-culture-bundle.appspot.com/workPerformed (bad html layout noted) http://sdo-culture-bundle.appspot.com/VisualArtwork This doesn't have examples yet, and there are some overlaps with existing property usage that need addressing, but it should soon give us a unified view of cultural heritage-related improvements. Dan > "This is a proposal for a new property on schema.org's Event class. > Property name: workPerformed > This property is expected to be used on Event, with values that are a > CreativeWork. > It indicates that the CreativeWork was performed at the Event. > e.g. a http://schema.org/TheaterEvent might be performing Macbeth." > > The latter should compliment the various bibextend suggestions and > existing schema.org vocab, by bridging the CreativeWork and Event type > hierarchies. > > Dan
Received on Sunday, 6 April 2014 19:09:29 UTC