W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties

From: Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:16:13 +0000
To: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EFC9D9C0-180A-4FD4-B551-E89C2B7E3498@oclc.org>
Excellent!  Great efforts from the team responsible.

However, I do agree with Stéphane and Dan about the incoming properties, especially on a well referenced Type such as Person. 


On 4 Apr 2014, at 14:24, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:49:25PM +0100, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> Just a heads up - we're just switching over to a new version of the
>> schema.org site.
>> First the good news! Examples are now shown in a tabbed format that
>> gives us space to include RDFa and JSON-LD examples alongside the
>> Microdata. 
> Fantastic!
>> The per-type pages also now show incoming properties; for
>> example, when browsing http://schema.org/Person you are now told that
>> this type provides values for properties such as 'author',
>> 'reviewedBy', 'founder', 'spouse', 'director'.
> I'm with Stéphane on this; like the idea, but maybe the implementation
> could be tweaked to maintain the examples-front-and-centre approach that
> schema.org has benefited from since its inception.
>> The bad news is only temporary: There are a few glitches that we're
>> working to fix asap. Firstly, the Acknowledgements section was not
>> displaying. Also there seems to be an issue with properties from
>> supertypes and the breadcrumbs hierarchy not showing. Investigating...
> The HTML for the property tables is a bit twisted: there are instances
> like the following which even the most gifted HTML5 parser will have
> trouble with:
> <tbody class=supertype<tr>
> <th class=prop-nam' scope=row>
> I also noticed that no 404 is returned for invalid URLs, like
> http://schema.org/ohnoesss - just a 200 and a "No comments" page.
> It would be nice to continue to have some indication of the version of
> schema.org that is being documented and perhaps some metadata about when
> the page was last updated.
> Many thanks to the team responsible for this update, this is a big step
> forward!
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 14:18:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:39 UTC