W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2013

RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:15:05 +0000
To: 'jean delahousse' <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A71D9E70FCEE5E40A5EAA598864E605705DF7AF8@mailprd.gva.ebu.ch>
Thanks Stéphane,

Looks promising.

Jean-pierre

From: jean delahousse [mailto:delahousse.jean@gmail.com]
Sent: lundi, 23. septembre 2013 09:10
To: Stéphane Corlosquet
Cc: Dan Brickley; public-vocabs@w3.org
Subject: Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion

Stéphane,

Thanks a lot, I should have done it much earlier, but I have been doing some procrastination about it.

I am sure with the multiple feed backs and comments we should get an optimal insertion of Skos into Schema.org.

Sincerely
Jean

2013/9/22 Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com<mailto:scorlosquet@gmail.com>>
I've added the SKOS proposal sent by Jean Delahousse to the wiki [1] and converted it to a schema.org<http://schema.org> RDFS document [2].

We should probably discuss this proposal further now that's it's on the wiki.

Steph.

[1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SKOS
[2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/raw-file/tip/schema.org/ext/skos.html


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org<mailto:danbri@danbri.org>> wrote:
Hi!

On 10 January 2013 11:13, jean delahousse <delahousse.jean@gmail.com<mailto:delahousse.jean@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have worked on a integration of SKOS into Schema.org.
>
> The idea is to be able to publish pages about concepts described in a
> controled vocabulary and to describe the controlled vocabulary itself.
> Use case can be the publication of a library controlled vocabulary as Rameau
> from the French National Library (http://data.bnf.fr/13318366/musique/) or
> authorities by Library of Congress
> (http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2003003686.html) , or a glossary
> in a web site.
>
> I attached the draft. I would be happy to go on with this project with some
> of you.
Thanks for making a concrete proposal - this is really positive! Your
reward is that I ask something more from you ;)

Would you have time to make an HTML+RDFa+RDFS version of this proposal?

There are some examples in our WebSchemas area of W3C Mercurial repo, here:

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/default/schema.org/ext

I hope they are almost self-explanatory. We can get you access or just
send along HTML by mail/wiki. If you don't have time I 100%
understand, but I'm trying to build a workflow here that doesn't
suffer from my being a bottleneck, so hopefully this machine-readable
proposals mechanism will help...

cheers,

Dan



--
Steph.



--
Jean Delahousse
JDC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
delahousse.jean@gmail.com<mailto:delahousse.jean@gmail.com> - +33 6 01 22 48 55  http://jean-delahousse.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************
Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 07:15:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:31 UTC