W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Best schema to use for services

From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:38:30 +0200
Cc: David Deering <david@touchpointdigital.net>, Public Vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <29F3342B-1DB2-4D46-B532-FA18A9D6BAAD@ebusiness-unibw.org>
To: Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>

On Sep 13, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Jarno van Driel wrote:

>  But in reality, 99% of any mark up doesn't generate a Rich snippet.
> 
I think that is not the full truth. In fact, many people fail to properly check whether they get rich snippets, see

    http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/FFAQ#Why_is_Google_not_showing_rich_snippets_for_my_pages.3F

    Study: "Site Owners Are Too Impatient When It Comes to Google Rich Snippets"    
    http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Documentation/Rich_Snippets

Martin

> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:23 PM, David Deering <david@touchpointdigital.net> wrote:
> No problem, Jarno, and thanks for the links.  So if you do not include a price with the product, the schema will not validate?  And perhaps a dumb question, but can you simply eliminate price tag/code, or would that cause the schema not to validate as well?
> 
> 

--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 15:38:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:31 UTC