RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion

I would paraphrase Guha

"if using enumConcept is enough to discourage a broad audience to use schema.org, then it it sad"

Jean-pierre
________________________________________
From: Martin Hepp [martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org]
Sent: 08 October 2013 08:20
To: Dan Brickley
Cc: Jarno van Driel; Evain, Jean-Pierre; Thad Guidry; Dan Brickley; Guha; Stéphane Corlosquet; jean delahousse; public-vocabs@w3.org
Subject: Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion

On Oct 7, 2013, at 11:22 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:

> Can anyone here _not_ live with EnumConcept, given the various
> constraints and viewpoints expressed so far?
>
> Dan

I personally would prefer TerminologyConcept or TerminologicalConcept, because the notion of Enumeration and in particular the abbreviation Enum is, IMO, a bit difficult for broad audiences.
But I am not religious about it. EnumConcept could do.

Martin

--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************

Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2013 08:00:25 UTC