W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Ease of adoption

From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:30:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CACfEFw8Qjc3csuStj6ibJ3+O7DDeOv-4NTLQWxu=ceQCUdyaKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
On Jul 29, 2013 10:17 AM, "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> IMHO that says it, succinctly and for a knowledgeable audience.
>   If you look at intro type books (dummys ... etc), there is much more
> of a sell there. Persuasion as to why this tech is useful for them,
> meets an objective the reader may have?

I don't know how aggressive of a campaign schema.org is going for, but, to
me, the tech sells itself.

* More relevant search results
* Store structured data within an HTML page
* Extract structured data from an HTML page

>
> E.g. "A collection of schemas"... WTF is a schema...?

[ Human contextually disambiguates to "Database schema" ]

* http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema
* http://dbpedia.org/page/Schema
* http://schema.rdfs.org/all.ttl

schema ~== http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology_(information_science)

>
> " html tags, that webmasters can use to markup their pages in ways
> recognized by major search providers."
>   Oh - that's not me then, I'm not a webmaster...
>
> I.e just the slant?
>
> Does that make sense?

"Helps doctors find research for finding cures"
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 16:31:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:28 UTC