W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Syntax for boolean in schema.org?

From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:36:30 -0400
To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org Org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130722193629.GA7702@denials.eastlink.ca>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:00:03PM +0200, Martin Hepp wrote:
> Dear Dan:
> 
> I think the following issue is still open:
> 
> 	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Apr/0038.html
> 	http://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/14

</snip>
 
> 1. Proposed change:
> 
> A simple text amendment for 
> http://schema.org/True, http://schema.org/False, and http://schema.org/Boolean
>  would do the trick.:
> 
> Note: The recommended use of this datatype is with a string “true” or “false” indicating the value of the respective property.
> Example:
> <div itemscope itemtype="
> http://schema.org/Book
> ">
> <span itemprop="name">The Catcher in the Rye</span>
>  Family-friendly: <meta itemprop="isFamilyFriendly" content="true"> yes
> </div>
> 
> 2. Proposed action: Add this note to  
> http://schema.org/Boolean 

+1 to the proposed change and to resolving the issue ASAP

This issue came up recently in the schema.org bibliographic extension
community[1] and I (at least) am proceeding under the assumption that
schema.org will adopt the simple content="true" / content="false"
amendment.

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/2013Jul/0096.html
Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 19:37:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:28 UTC