Re: Should we adopt SKOS?

On 1/12/13 4:00 AM, Martin Hepp wrote:
> 2. We need a clear, shared agreement on what schema.org is and isn't. IMO, we should regard it as the central registry of types and properties that*typical Web masters*  are encouraged to expose to*mainstream consumers*  of such data, in Microdata or RDFa syntax. That is also in line with the self-characterization on the schema.org site.
+1

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Saturday, 12 January 2013 22:21:17 UTC