W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Technical Article vocab markup

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:12:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFr8__h1Wu=WpHE3f-+QOymyh+z+fSt--BaXh89r4bOKwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
Cc: Joshua Wulf <jwulf@redhat.com>, public-vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 20 February 2013 09:43, Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de> wrote:
> There is no Schema.org TechArticle. Would you like to extend the vocabulary
> then use the URI
>
> http://schema.org/Article/TechArticle

It's on its way (real soon now...); still clearing some backlog from
last year; http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/TechArticleSchema

Dan

> -Adrian Giurca
>
> On 2/20/2013 2:53 AM, Joshua Wulf wrote:
>>
>> I've started marking up Red Hat documentation with schema.org markup using
>> the proposed Technical Article Vocabulary [1].
>>
>> Here's what I'm doing at the moment:
>>
>> <body itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/TechArticle">
>>    <meta itemprop="aboutProduct" content="Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2">
>>
>> Three questions:
>> 1. Is that markup right?
>> 2. This is actually a book, the "Installation and Configuration Guide" -
>> is this the right vocab/use of the vocab?
>> 3. Any suggestions on what I should do next?
>>
>> [1] http://blog.schema.org/2012/06/newvocabularies-for-technical.html
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 13:12:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 20 February 2013 13:12:58 GMT