W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Technical Article vocab markup

From: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:43:22 +0100
Message-ID: <51249ABA.3030904@tu-cottbus.de>
To: Joshua Wulf <jwulf@redhat.com>
CC: public-vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
There is no Schema.org TechArticle. Would you like to extend the 
vocabulary then use the URI

http://schema.org/Article/TechArticle

-Adrian Giurca
On 2/20/2013 2:53 AM, Joshua Wulf wrote:
> I've started marking up Red Hat documentation with schema.org markup using the proposed Technical Article Vocabulary [1].
>
> Here's what I'm doing at the moment:
>
> <body itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/TechArticle">
>    <meta itemprop="aboutProduct" content="Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2">
>
> Three questions:
> 1. Is that markup right?
> 2. This is actually a book, the "Installation and Configuration Guide" - is this the right vocab/use of the vocab?
> 3. Any suggestions on what I should do next?
>
> [1] http://blog.schema.org/2012/06/newvocabularies-for-technical.html
>
> - Josh
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 09:44:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 20 February 2013 09:44:18 GMT