W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Proposal for new type : Vocabulary

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:27:45 -0800
Message-ID: <529E4CD1.5000208@kcoyle.net>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Bernard's proposal reminds me of the discussion that we had in the 
schemaBibEx group about non-URI identifiers, and the need to say:

1) this is an identifier
2) this is the issuer of the identifier (or some code or string that 
identifies the identifier type)

id: 12345768/h3 1996
idIssuer: USGPO [United States Government Printing Office]

It's a different case, yes, but a similar structure. I would think there 
might be other similar examples.

kc

On 12/3/13 12:04 PM, Thad Guidry wrote:
> Yes Bernard, that helps clarify...thanks!
>
> +1 for schema.org/Vocabulary <http://schema.org/Vocabulary>   (and with
> Bernard's very thoughtful definition of WHAT a vocabulary now means in
> the 21st century)
>
> I dispose on others to think about your suggestions and reply back in
> this thread and let's see what they think.
>
> --
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 21:28:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:36 UTC