W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > November 2012

More About GoodRelations Integration

From: Robert Kost <rkost@thematix.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:16:16 -0500
Message-Id: <E3975BFE-4739-4BF0-A015-166C8335849C@thematix.com>
To: SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Are there deeper and more definitive statements about the meaning of the integration of GoodRelations with Schema.org?

Does it mean simply that the entirety of the GoodRelations ontology (at http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1) has been 'imported' into Schema such that Schema is now a new namespace for all GoodRelations classes and properties?   Is there ever a reason to again use the gr: namespace?  Will GoodRelations, as such, be retired?  If not, will the two vocabularies remain in sync?

Or, does "integration" in addition mean that any GoodRelations domain vocabulary is ipso facto a legitimate, recognized extension to Schema?  For example, is an appropriately referenced class from the Vehicle Sales ontology (say, http://purl.org/vso/ns#Automobile) honored as a valid, spidered and rich-snippeted entity?  If so, are there rules and models for intermingling vocabularies?  

What comes after the press release?

Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 14:16:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:25 UTC