W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2012

Re: On using qualified names for properties

From: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:58:10 +0200
Message-ID: <4FAB9F42.40500@tu-cottbus.de>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Егор Антонов <elderos@yandex-team.ru>
CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hi Dan and Egor,

On 5/10/2012 12:34 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 10 May 2012 12:26, Егор Антонов<elderos@yandex-team.ru>  wrote:
>> No, there must be only http://schema.org/Thing/name I think
>> As an option, http://schema.org/CreativeWork/name can redirect to the parent
>> type, which owns this property
> I would call it http://schema.org/name, but yes, it's a single
> property, not two properties.
Of course.
>> If we think in terms of multiple itemtypes on a single object, adding a type
>> prefix is an organic way to avoid collisions and distinguish different types
>> properties
> The classic example is (addressbook contact) 'title' versus (document)
> 'title'. Schema.org simply has 'name' instead of (document)'title'.
> Some contact schemas have 'honorificPrefix' for (contact)title. It's
> usually possible to find an alternative word or phrase. This can be
> annoying for vocabulary managers and sometimes the word is not
> perfect, but it simplifies the data model.
> cheers,
> Dan
Thank you all,
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 10:58:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:23 UTC