W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event

From: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:11:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4F4F2F30.1080706@tu-cottbus.de>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: public-vocabs@w3.org
1. I find the markup for periodic events too verbose. I would propose a 
property of class Event
periodicity:Number - the number of units as repetition period.

The issue is with "unit" which can be any time unit such as second, 
minute, hour, day, week, ... but I believe it should be in accordance 
with startDate and endDate values.

2. eventCategory might be a http://schema.org/Enumeration This way it 
may have expected type URL

All the best,
- Adrian

On 2/29/2012 8:50 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 24 February 2012 16:39, Dan Brickley<danbri@danbri.org>  wrote:
>> I've just posted another draft proposal in the W3C wiki,
>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/EventSchemaUpdate
>>
>>  From the wrapper text there,
>>
>> "The proposal comes from the Google teams working with the existing
>> Event markup, and has been checked by the other schema.org partners
>> prior to publication. See PDF for full details of the proposal."
>>
>> * "Proposes 3 new properties of Event: eventStatus, previousStartDate,
>> previousEndDate to support canceled or rescheduled events.
>> * Adds eventCategory to support categorised events.
>> * Supports recurring events by making startDate and endDate repeated.
>> * Encourages use of existing 'url' property (of Thing) to link to
>> associated Web pages."
>>
>> Feedback as ever welcomed here or in the Wiki.
> OK, we didn't get a lot of discussion on this proposal. It has had
> some review elsewhere and is based on implementation feedback on the
> earlier deployed vocab so I suggest we wrap this one up quickly.
>
> Consider this a last call for comments on
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/EventSchemaUpdate, where btw the phrase 'Last
> Call' doesn't have the formality associated with official W3C
> standards. Rather it means, "hey, we're expecting to update schema.org
> based on this draft Real Soon Now and welcome your comments". Thanks
> for any feedback :)
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 08:12:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:48:59 GMT