W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > July 2012

Re: Feedback on Dataset Schema

From: David F. Flanders <david.flanders@ands.org.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:42:28 +1000
Message-ID: <CANZdtOLktbCEtP9zqKu3nE7cpH_1OXY4o8F-r3YKWmp1mCr15A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org>
Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org, Leigh Dodds <ld@talis.com>, Joshua Shinavier <josh@fortytwo.net>
Just a quick fyi, as i need to read this thread still... Have a look at
'research data Australia', lots of examples of human description of
datasets.  Though lots more to be done on machine readable datasets. /dff
On Jul 12, 2012 9:24 PM, "Richard Wallis" <richard.wallis@oclc.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> On 12/07/2012 12:15, "Leigh Dodds" <ld@talis.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> As well as a short description,
> >>>>> pointers to fuller documentation are also useful.
> >>>>
> >>> I think discussionUrl would be useful *as well* but a page to say how
> >>> a dataset was collated or is curated might be a useful addition to the
> >>> description. Would just be a page about the dataset.
> >>
> >> Wouldn't that be just 'schema:url'?
> >
> > Perhaps, but not necessarily. Depends whether you would expect to see
> > a full set of data model or data analysis documentation right on the
> > homepage of the dataset itself. I think in most cases these would be
> > separate resources.
>
> I suppose it depends on who it is for - a human would probably expect to
> see
> that stuff linked from the dataset home page.   If you are talking about
> specific links to things a machine might follow, then specific attributes
> may be relevant here.
>
> ~Richard.
>
> --
> Richard Wallis
> Technology Evangelist
> OCLC
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 16 July 2012 05:28:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 July 2012 05:28:21 GMT