W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Comment versus UserComments

From: Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:02:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CACWrOGZ6E5Dd16KF9=G4uuFtLLA__vR21Dfhu5c-0M7v8FhNwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, public-vocabs@w3.org
Thanks for these thoughtful comments. I also like that proposed direction
for Comment.

How about a play of a video, or a favorite of an object, and the other
non-comment UserInteractions? Do you have any thoughts there?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:14, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
> ...
>
>> Can we get a couple of sample real-world pages that can guide our
>> decisions here? Stéphane - do you have something from Drupal 7 maybe?
>>
>
> You can look at the comments of any Drupal 7 site, for example [1]<http://goo.gl/KZShd>.
> I took the markup of that comment and stripped it down to highlight the
> relevant type and properties we use:
>
> <div typeof="sioct:Comment">
>   <span rel="sioc:has_creator"><a typeof="schema:Person"
> property="schema:name" rel="foaf:page" href="http://lin-clark.com">Lin
> Clark</a></span>
>   <span property="dc:date" content="2011-10-01T10:12:00+02:00"
> datatype="xsd:dateTime">Sat, 01/10/2011 - 10:12</span>
>   <h3 property="dc:title">Wow, big news!</h3>
>   <span rel="sioc:reply_of"
> resource="/blog/2011/09/30/schemaorg-rich-snippets-drupal-7-rdfa"></span>
>   <div property="content:encoded">Wow, big news!. It also looks like
> Google might have fixed their RDFa parser? It doesn't seem like you are
> using Rich Snippets module to change the placement of the image's rel
> attribute, which was required before to get the image to show up. This is
> great because I'm planning on doing a project that aggregates content from
> Drupal sites and uses the Schema.org vocabulary to model things... and now
> people can do it in either RDFa or microdata and still get the SEO benefit
> from it.</div>
> </div>
>
> Except for the missing schema.org Comment type, some of the properties
> used above have an equivalent at http://schema.org/CreativeWork:
> sioc:has_creator => author
> dc:date => dateCreated
> dc:title => name
>
> A comment body property should be created for the Comment type (I guess it
> would be called commentBody following the same convention as articleBody
> for the type Article).
>
> sioc:reply_of is used to link to the post the comment is replying to.
> Looking at http://schema.org/CreativeWork it seems the comment property
> could be used to link an article to its comments, but this needs to be
> clarified wrt to UserComments and UserInteraction (already mentioned in
> this thread). The type Comment could also define a property to refer to the
> post it replies to, such as 'repliesTo' or 'parentItem' (Review
> defines itemReviewed for example). This property would be equivalent to
> sioc:reply_of. Drupal 7 also use the same sioc:reply_of property to link to
> the parent comment in the case of threaded discussions.
>
> Steph.
>
> [1] http://goo.gl/KZShd
>
Received on Friday, 20 January 2012 02:03:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:48:59 GMT