W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Comment versus UserComments

From: Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:31:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CACWrOGb_WF8m_55ySPnxpnabkJHpjxtsWjOz-FPkKa5eNagdLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, public-vocabs@w3.org
Thanks to both of you for getting this kicked off.

Here are some examples of pages that I think could guide this:

the bottom]
the comment block inserted by Javascript]

Some of those are comments, some of those are favorites or likes, etc.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:21, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> Thanks Daniel for raising this, and Stéphane for digging out the
> previous discussion.
> Let's get this fixed. I've raised an issue to track this as
> https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/12
> with the summary "Comment is under UserInteractions not CreativeWork;
> the former focus on aggregation". This does not capture all the
> nuances but I've linked the full threads from the tracker.
> Couple of brief points for now:
> 1. Even though we don't assert that Comment is subclass of
> CreativeWork, we also don't anywhere assert that no comments are
> CreativeWorks. It might be there are some idioms where treating some
> comments as creative works in this way is useful.
> 2. Yes, Schema.org's use of plurality for class (and property) names
> is unconventional. I've amended
> https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/5 (which is about
> plural usage in property names) to note the class situation needs
> handling too.
> Can we get a couple of sample real-world pages that can guide our
> decisions here? Stéphane - do you have something from Drupal 7 maybe?
> cheers,
> Dan
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2012 01:32:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:22 UTC