- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:14:03 +0200
- To: Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
On 19 April 2012 20:59, Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com> wrote: > Looks good to me. > > """ > Each such URL has the following structure: 'http://schema.org/' + 'ext/' + > authority id + '/' + scope + '/' + term > """ > > Is that in conflict with the proposal elsewhere > (http://ext.schema.org/wikipedia etc.), or am I misunderstanding? If it's > not in conflict could you add an explanation? There's a simple explanation - editing error on my part. :/ I missed this line while updating the text from an earlier design. Fixed. The proposal now is to do everything via ext.schema.org sub-domain. Thanks, Dan
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 19:14:31 UTC