- From: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 23:05:30 +0100
- To: public-vc-wg@w3.org
Sorry but it not obvious to me how I vote on any of these, except by adding a comment. Please advise David On 27/10/2017 18:20, Daniel Burnett wrote: > Reminder all -- please review and/or approve. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Manu Sporny* <msporny@digitalbazaar.com > <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> > Date: Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:43 PM > Subject: VC Data Model spec is now blocked - please review/approve PRs > To: W3C Verifiable Claims Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org > <mailto:public-vc-wg@w3.org>> > > > Hi all, > > There are now 15 open pull requests that need review by the Working > Group for inclusion in the specification. Please read the PRs, request > changes, or vote thumbs up if you want the merge to happen: > > https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pulls > <https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pulls> > > Almost all of these changes are not very controversial. The most > controversial one is replacing "inspector-verifier" with "verifier". > This is also the most important one to merge as it touches most of the > spec. If you had to focus on one, focus on this one because it'll > unblock the rest of the edits on the spec. > > At this point, it'll be very difficult to submit any more PRs to the > spec without creating merge conflicts. We need to get the backlog dealt > with so we can make further prose changes as suggested by Joe Andrieu, > David Chadwick, and Dave Longley. > > Please review the PRs so we can pull as many of them in during the call > next week. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built > http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ > <http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/> > >
Received on Friday, 27 October 2017 22:05:58 UTC