W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-uwa@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Short-Term DIAL Evolution

From: José Manuel Cantera Fonseca <jmcf@tid.es>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:04:59 +0100
To: "Smith, Kevin, VF-Group" <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>
Cc: Ubiquitous Web Applications Working Group WG <public-uwa@w3.org>
Message-id: <478B7A1B.2020103@tid.es>

Hi Kevin,

I totally agree wrt the Delivery Context functions !!! I was suggesting 
with my e-mail some work items that could be worth addressing in DIAL as 
language, independently of the DC functions.

Best Regards

Smith, Kevin, VF-Group escribió:
> Hi José,
>
> To me the key driver to get a form of DIAL adopted is a standard delivery context API. This would likely take the form of a set of expressions which would be understood by compliant processors on servers (and potentially clients), and would hence allow portability of DIAL documents. As mentioned at [1], such an API would be based on the Delivery Context ontology, and could be bound to XSLT functions to allow a quick plug-in to existing documents.
>
> Cheers
> Kevin
>
>
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-uwa/2008Jan/0005.html
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-uwa-request@w3.org [mailto:public-uwa-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
> Sent: 14 January 2008 12:41
> To: Ubiquitous Web Applications Working Group WG
> Subject: Short-Term DIAL Evolution
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been thinking on the short-term evolution of DIAL. The following 
> items are the result of a my own brainstorming, so feel free to discuss 
> them :)
>
> + Decoupling DIAL from XHTML 2 i.e base DIAL on different modules some 
> coming from XHTML 1 and some coming from XHTML 2. For example, the Role 
> and Access modules seem to be very stable but other XHTML 2 modules not
> + Decoupling DIAL from DISelect (i.e. perhaps making DISelect an 
> optional module)
> + Add some markup for simple policies, like pagination or layout (for 
> layout we can only address the minimum set of use cases needed for 
> mobile development and leave the generalization to the upcoming 
> Layered-UI XG)
> + Standardize some values for something like the 'appearance' property 
> in CSS to map between the XForms controls and its concrete 
> representation. It is expected that the future Concrete UI Markup will 
> make this more general but we can start with a very simple spec
>
> What do others think?
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
>   
Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 15:12:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:37:21 GMT