W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-usable-authentication@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [fwd] Re: Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines (from: timeless@gmail.com) ( LC-2087)

From: <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:18:24 +0000
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: public-usable-authentication@w3.org,timeless@gmail.com
Message-Id: <E1LPzRw-0000AP-Vs@wiggum.w3.org>


 Dear Thomas Roessler ,

The Web Security Context Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent
[1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Web Security Context: User
Interface Guidelines published on 24 Jul 2008. Thank you for having taken
the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-usable-authentication@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 29
January 2009. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Web Security Context Working Group,
Thomas Roessler
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/20080806163050.GX4194@iCoaster.does-not-exist.org
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/


=====

Your comment on 6.1.2 Identity Signal Content:
> >       Subject logotypes derived from certificates SHOULD NOT be
> rendered, unless the certificate used is an augmented assurance
> certificate.
> 
> why is this a should not instead of a must not?


Working Group Resolution (LC-2087):
Thank you. While we have discussed this, and decided on MUST NOT. 

----
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 13:18:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:15 GMT