W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-usable-authentication@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [fwd] Re: Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines (from: timeless@gmail.com) ( LC-2087)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:26:37 +0100
To: mzurko@us.ibm.com
Message-Id: <89F6AC0A-0F34-45D6-9DB2-230EBCB7A631@w3.org>
Cc: public-usable-authentication@w3.org, timeless@gmail.com

Since I was channeling timeless here, I'll ask him to respond.
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 22 Jan 2009, at 14:18, mzurko@us.ibm.com wrote:

>
> Dear Thomas Roessler ,
>
> The Web Security Context Working Group has reviewed the comments you  
> sent
> [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Web Security Context:  
> User
> Interface Guidelines published on 24 Jul 2008. Thank you for having  
> taken
> the time to review the document and to send us comments!
>
> The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.
>
> Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
> public-usable-authentication@w3.org if you agree with it or not  
> before 29
> January 2009. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
> specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working  
> Group. If
> such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the  
> opportunity to
> raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
> during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
> Recommendation Track.
>
> Thanks,
>
> For the Web Security Context Working Group,
> Thomas Roessler
> W3C Staff Contact
>
> 1.
> http://www.w3.org/mid/20080806163050.GX4194@iCoaster.does-not- 
> exist.org
> 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/
>
>
> =====
>
> Your comment on 6.1.2 Identity Signal Content:
>>>      Subject logotypes derived from certificates SHOULD NOT be
>> rendered, unless the certificate used is an augmented assurance
>> certificate.
>>
>> why is this a should not instead of a must not?
>
>
> Working Group Resolution (LC-2087):
> Thank you. While we have discussed this, and decided on MUST NOT.
>
> ----
>
>
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 13:26:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:15 GMT