Re: Secure Chrome

On Tuesday 11 April 2006 18:30, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> No active content at all. Zippo. No javascript. No Java. No ActiveX.
>
> Web browsing the way nature intended :-).
>
> Yes, there's a lot of things you couldn't do with such a browser. But it
> has the benefit of simplicity.

  Do you think any website developers will ever accept such a thing? :-)  I 
think not...

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer    http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.  http://www.staikos.net/

Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:56:38 UTC