W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > May 2013

RE: FW: additional examples

From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 10:49:47 +0000
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
CC: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E9A92BD0A4FC934EB7935470A46D15241F62BC25@DB3EX14MBXC325.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
(1)    Agreed, that would look simpler. The same is true for the region designator.

(2)    Yes, the inter <p> text is just an artifact of cut and paste; and needs to be deleted.

(3)    True, but I wanted the text to be roughly equivalent in all the examples, for the spec you could elide some of it.

In rollup yes there is  no simple way to effect smooth rollup without a lot of assumptions and over use of <set>. This is something we have on our to do list to address in 1.1; if you want to put in a pointer to the note, that would probably be helpful.

At the time I wrote these did not have an SDP-US schema. I have since created one, so I’ve redone the examples with the above changes as SDP  versions, and validated against the attached schema. If people would like to double check that the schema correctly represents the SDP, and also that the examples don’t violate any of the non-schema checkable SDP rules, that would be helpful.


From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
Sent: 01 May 2013 21:23
To: Sean Hayes
Cc: public-tt@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: additional examples


For paint-on example,

(1) you include the same begin/duration for each paragraph; i wonder if it would be just as easy to put that on the outer div and remove timing on the paragraphs

(2) you include some '-' characters, i.e., #PCDATA, as children of div (between paragraphs), but #PCDATA is not supported there;

(3) i wonder if it is necessary to have multiple paragraphs each performing paint-on, when one should suffice for an example

For roll-up example,

(1) you include some '-' characters, i.e., #PCDATA, as children of div (between paragraphs), but #PCDATA is not supported there;

(2) presumably, you are relying on the Note in 9.3.2 to effect smooth scrolling to achieve a smooth rather than discrete (jump) roll-up effect, yes?

Where an implementation is able to detect significant similarity between two adjacent synchronic document instances, DOCinterN DOCinterN−1, then it is preferred that the implementation make the transition between presenting the two instances as smooth as possible, e.g., as described by [CEA-608-C]<file:///\\Users\glenn\work\w3c\ttml\ttml10\spec\ttaf1-dfxp.html#cea608c>, § C.3.

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com<mailto:Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>> wrote:

From: Sean Hayes
Sent: 18 April 2013 07:20
To: Glenn Adams (glenn@skynav.com<mailto:glenn@skynav.com>)
Subject: additional examples

Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 10:52:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:08 UTC