W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > May 2013

Re: FW: additional examples

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 04:35:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dk_a3jdkyqCqj_ec_idEe9e1Ph4YVtpiFPt2vr338ewQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
Thanks. I rewrote the examples a bit and broke out a pop-up example as
well. See the (now) Appendix O. I also moved away from SDP-US profile a bit
by using time-offset expressions and providing an alternative
timeContainer='seq' usage in the pop-up example for showing a comparison
between timing forms.


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote:

>  **(1)    **Agreed, that would look simpler. The same is true for the
> region designator.****
>
> **(2)    **Yes, the inter <p> text is just an artifact of cut and paste;
> and needs to be deleted.****
>
> **(3)    **True, but I wanted the text to be roughly equivalent in all
> the examples, for the spec you could elide some of it.****
>
> ** **
>
> In rollup yes there is  no simple way to effect smooth rollup without a
> lot of assumptions and over use of <set>. This is something we have on our
> to do list to address in 1.1; if you want to put in a pointer to the note,
> that would probably be helpful.****
>
> ** **
>
> At the time I wrote these did not have an SDP-US schema. I have since
> created one, so I’ve redone the examples with the above changes as SDP  versions,
> and validated against the attached schema. If people would like to double
> check that the schema correctly represents the SDP, and also that the
> examples don’t violate any of the non-schema checkable SDP rules, that
> would be helpful.****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,****
>
> Sean.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
> *Sent:* 01 May 2013 21:23
> *To:* Sean Hayes
> *Cc:* public-tt@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: FW: additional examples****
>
> ** **
>
> Questions:****
>
> ** **
>
> For paint-on example,****
>
> ** **
>
> (1) you include the same begin/duration for each paragraph; i wonder if it
> would be just as easy to put that on the outer div and remove timing on the
> paragraphs****
>
> ** **
>
> (2) you include some '-' characters, i.e., #PCDATA, as children of div
> (between paragraphs), but #PCDATA is not supported there;****
>
> ** **
>
> (3) i wonder if it is necessary to have multiple paragraphs each
> performing paint-on, when one should suffice for an example****
>
> ** **
>
> For roll-up example,****
>
> ** **
>
> (1) you include some '-' characters, i.e., #PCDATA, as children of div
> (between paragraphs), but #PCDATA is not supported there;****
>
> ** **
>
> (2) presumably, you are relying on the Note in 9.3.2 to effect smooth
> scrolling to achieve a smooth rather than discrete (jump) roll-up effect,
> yes?****
>
> *Note:*****
>
> Where an implementation is able to detect significant similarity between
> two adjacent synchronic document instances, *DOCinterN* *DOCinterN−1*,
> then it is preferred that the implementation make the transition between
> presenting the two instances as smooth as possible, e.g., as described by
> [CEA-608-C], § C.3.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
> wrote:****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Sean Hayes
> *Sent:* 18 April 2013 07:20
> *To:* Glenn Adams (glenn@skynav.com)
> *Subject:* additional examples****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 11:36:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:08 UTC