W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > August 2012

Re: quick questions

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:40:39 +0800
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cJbzu20Ead+4s-Xd9TVC6asZDY9-heauFDwRa8v7qWUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kouichi Uchimura <Kouichi.Uchimura@jp.sony.com>
Cc: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Kouichi Uchimura <
Kouichi.Uchimura@jp.sony.com> wrote:

> Yes. I can understand your comment., that is the answer I was looking
> for.
> And can agree to you.
> Processers will have such values internally
>  if implementers understand this correctly.

basically, TTML uses the same terminology and semantics for style property
resolution as does CSS and XSL-FO, both of which are normatively referenced
by TTML, and to which semantics we refer multiple times; as such, we had
not thought it necessary to repeat the terminology and semantics from CSS
and XSL-FO in the prose of TTML;

the only exception is in section 8.4 in that we attempted to be more
explicit about style resolution that was the case in CSS2; also, this was
needed since TTML introduced new mechanisms (referential and chained
referential styling) to specify styles by reference which were not present
in CSS or XSL-FO;
Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 01:41:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:06 UTC