W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > June 2009

Re: *Last Call* Timed Text document (Review by June 30)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:36:57 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830906281536y6e0b70d6wca12b14bf3c0eb21@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-tt@w3.org TTWG List" <public-tt@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Daniel Weck<daniel.weck@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2009, at 17:25, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>> * Why is the backgroundColor called "transparent", when the region
>> attribute is called "opacity" - why not choose the same word?
> Personally, I'm all for keeping the attribute name "opacity" (I'm used to
> the SMIL notation and I'm very happy with it), but I would suggest removing
> "(or transparency)" in the text for [8.2.14 tts:opacity]. It's very
> misleading.

I just checked and CSS / HTML styles also use both words: opacity in
CSS and transparent as a colour. I guess if it's been done before we
should not worry about it either.

Received on Sunday, 28 June 2009 22:37:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:04 UTC