W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > October 2008

Agenda for telecon - Friday 24th

From: David Kirby <david.kirby@rd.bbc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:26:53 +0100
Message-ID: <4900A5CD.7060204@rd.bbc.co.uk>
To: public-tt@w3.org

Here's the agenda for our call tomorrow.
David

TT telecon: Friday 24th October 10:00/Eastern, 3:00/UK 
------------------------------------------------------

Note next meeting: Friday 31st October 10:00/Eastern, 3:00/UK - Sean to chair


1. Review action items
      www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/open

2. Implementations
     Are any further details available for the spreadsheet?

3. Test suite
     Any additions to the test suite? - Glenn
     Review coverage details from Philippe - see http://www.w3.org/2008/10/dfxp-test-coverage.html
     Documentation of expected results from each test

4. Initial tests
     Can we run initial tests with the test suite?
     If not, what else is needs to be in place?

5. Tracker for issues
     Start to capture issues in tracker?

6. 708 translation (postpone, as Sean can't make this call)

7. Discussion items and errata
    a) metadata.
        Why do we need to allow more than 1?
        Should ttm:* elements be children of metadata, or can we get rid of
metadata?
          Should desc be description?
          Volunteers to provide some examples of the metadata

          ttm:role - only one form of narration. Suggestion to expand this
for use in audio description.

        b) timing.
                i) spec issue. default values for many parameters not
specified by : xxx
               in particular default timing semantics for region, p and span
are not defined.

             ii) spec issue. reference to SMIL should be S 10.4.1 not 10.3.1

             iii) duration has error in spec (<digit>+)
duration>
  : <digit> ( "." <digit>+ )? metric
metric
  : "s"                 // seconds
  | "ms"                // milliseconds
  | "f"                 // frames
  | "t"                 // ticks

                iv) can we make secifying dur and end a validity violation?

        c) style

                i) bidi-override is defined identically to direction -
surely we only need one.


                ii) CEA 708 can specify region borders, but we can't.
                iii) should display apply to region? - cf. Geoff input.

                iv) no example for display align center.
                v) no example for wrapOption = wrap.

                vi) overflow scroll is probably unecessary as it implies an
interaction model.

                vii) lineheight perhaps should apply to div or region.
8. AOB
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 16:27:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 November 2009 22:41:35 GMT