[DFXP LC Comment] Some questions (was: Re: [tt] Some questions)

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Some questions that came up while reading the draft:
> 
> * Why isn't the specification using xml:id?
> * Why is the specification using its own attribute rather than CSS?
> * Why does the specification refer to CSS2, which has been revised?
> * Why do we need a totally new specification for this which reinvents a
>   lot of elements and attributes? (And CSS.)
> * Why does the specification has so many namespaces?
> * I assume the namespaces will change before this specification goes to
>   CR? Although this is not really the "final publishing of this
>   specification" the specification and WG do need sufficient feedback
>   from implementors before they can move on to PR and beyond.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 19:42:04 UTC