- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:39:00 +0100
- To: public-tt@w3.org
Some questions that came up while reading the draft: * Why isn't the specification using xml:id? * Why is the specification using its own attribute rather than CSS? * Why does the specification refer to CSS2, which has been revised? * Why do we need a totally new specification for this which reinvents a lot of elements and attributes? (And CSS.) * Why does the specification has so many namespaces? * I assume the namespaces will change before this specification goes to CR? Although this is not really the "final publishing of this specification" the specification and WG do need sufficient feedback from implementors before they can move on to PR and beyond. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 19:39:09 UTC