W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Agenda for the Sept 11 call (V01)

From: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:53:46 -0400
Message-ID: <5230920A.3090503@appnexus.com>
To: Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org>
CC: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
The presence of the agenda item to discuss publication adds to the 
confusion about the dates.

On 2013-09-11 11:46 AM, Jack Hobaugh wrote:
> Isn't the deadline for feedback on the proposed plan September 13?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 11, 2013, at 11:37 AM, David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com 
> <mailto:dwainberg@appnexus.com>> wrote:
>
>> I wasn't aware of a deadline for comments regarding publication as a 
>> WD. Where was this deadline published?
>>
>> On 2013-09-11 11:35 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> thanks a lot for your input.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the deadline on comments has passed yesterday and 
>>> this snapshot is currently under submission for publication.
>>> It should have sufficient disclaimers (I tried my best) and I would 
>>> appreciate your inputs for the next release that we will publish soon.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/09/2013 15:41, David Wainberg wrote:
>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>
>>>> On 2013-09-05 7:35 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
>>>>> 6. Publication of the current editor's draft as a working draft:
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html
>>>>>     I have asked our editors to
>>>>>         - insert a disclaimer that this is only the current 
>>>>> starting point of our
>>>>>             discussion and that the text is not consensus of the 
>>>>> group.
>>>>>         - to list the issues currently open
>>>>>         - Indicating that more issues can be raised until October 02.
>>>>>    Discussion (you may email before the call, too):
>>>>>    What are additional concrete changes to the text that are 
>>>>> essential before we publish?
>>>> In my view, we're not ready to publish this as a Working Draft. 
>>>> There are too many open issues and questions about the process 
>>>> going forward. According to W3C process, publication of a Working 
>>>> Draft is an indication to the world at large that the doc is 
>>>> approaching last call and is ready for broad public review. I don't 
>>>> think we're there yet. I would ask that we hold on doing this until 
>>>> things settle a bit.
>>>>
>>>> Much thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 15:54:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:18 UTC