- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 00:28:35 +0200
- To: Susan Israel <Susan_Israel@comcast.com>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Thanks, Rigo and Susan. Proposal and counterproposal both noted: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_First_Party_Compliance Regards, Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) On 2013-06-26, at 18:50 +0200, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote: > Counterproposal: > First parties may elect to be more restrictive in their data collection > practices than proscribed in this Specification. If first parties only > collect data as permitted for third parties when receiving a DNT:1 > header, they can indicate this according to the tracking status message > as set forth in the Tracking Preference Expression Specification. This > also allows them to use DNT:0 as a permission mechanism for regulated > environments. > > --Rigo > > On Wednesday 26 June 2013 02:30:11 Israel, Susan wrote: >> In Section 4, First Party Compliance, I think the third paragraph >> "(First parties may elect to follow third party practices.") should >> be deleted. >> >> I don't think it's meaningful and I think it's better to have one >> clear rule rather than offering different levels of compliance. >> >> Susan Israel > >
Received on Sunday, 30 June 2013 22:28:38 UTC