Re: June Change Proposal: Meaning of DNT: 0

Noted, along with Rigo's no-change proposal:
	http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_DNT_0

I have also moved ISSUE-148 to the Compliance June product; note that this issue was previously marked "pending review" based on long-standing stable text (that the June draft picked up on).

Thanks,

Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler)




On 2013-06-26, at 17:14 +0200, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote:

> The June Draft defines DNT: 0 as "a preference for a personalized experience."  That seems out of line with the text's focus on collection/retention/use/sharing of browsing histories rather than website personalization.
> 
> I would propose dropping the first paragraph of User-Granted Exceptions that attempts to define what DNT: 0 means.  The following paragraph seems sufficient—DNT: 0 means whatever a user agrees to in providing consent.
>