W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2013

Re: DNT: Agenda for Wednesday call, February 20

From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:09:20 +0100
To: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <d8bbcefc64387043d9fad015f8dc7c3d@xs4all.nl>

I think it is necessayr to discuss the nuance in market research. It is 
a broad concept and creates a lot of misunderstanding at the moment.

Peter made it clear in the F2F, after talking with Esomar, that panel 
calibration based types of market research are not OK when DNT=1 and 
needs explicit consent. Just like personal panel invitations are consent 
based at the moment, e.g. when you fill in a survey that you get within 
a customer loyalty programm.

Market research as in the traditional sense is to be limited through 
discussions. I got the sense that the nuance of what Esomar is looking 
for may become clear.

But I agree that a non-limited definition as found in the multi-site 
princeples is not the way forward.

mvg::Rob

Walter van Holst schreef op 2013-02-20 12:52:
> On 2/19/13 8:54 PM, Peter Swire wrote:
>> David:
>> 
>> 1. "Market research" has been proposed as a permitted use, to go into
>> the text of the spec.  It is an important topic in practice for a 
>> range
>> of companies.  The DAA code, which overlaps in its coverage with DNT
>> issues, has an exception/permitted use for "market research."  To get
>> adoption of DNT, getting clarity on "market research" seems entirely
>> relevant.
> 
> Dear Peter,
> 
> Given the very limited support for the idea of market research (for 
> any
> common understood idea of market research) as a permitted use in this
> group, I'm not sure whether it is beneficial to the credibility of the
> process to try to define it in this standard.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  Walter
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 12:09:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:04 UTC