W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Batch closing of issues (ISSUE-144, ISSUE-187, ISSUE-190, ISSUE-173, ISSUE-138) [pls Respond by Jan 30]

From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:14:14 -0500
Message-ID: <51195F26.9090405@schunter.org>
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Team,

fyi: I have closed ISSUEs 190, 173, 138
I have left ISSUE-144 and ISSUE-187 open for our Wednesday discussion.

Regards,
matthias

On 21/01/2013 08:07, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I suggest to batch-close the issues listed below that have been marked 
> PENDING REVIEW for a while.
> If you disagree with my proposal to close any of those issues, please 
> respond by Wednesday, Jan 30.
>
> Regards,
>  matthias
> --------------------------------
> ISSUE-138: Web-Wide Exception Well Known URI
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/138
>
> The issue was how to obtain exceptions without Javascript-able 
> real-estate. Our discussions are reflected in Section 6.8 of the 
> current spec and (unless someone objects), I plan to close ISSUE-138.
> --------------------------------
> ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior 
> while granting and for future requests?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144
>
> IMHO, the new approach to exceptions has removed the requirements on 
> the user agent.
> As a consequence, I believe we can close this issue.
> --------------------------------
> ISSUE-187: What is the right approach to exception handling?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/187
>
> During the last call, I validated that there is a general preference 
> for pursuing our rivised approach to exceptions (where the sites 
> records preference and the UA may double-check it with the user). All 
> participants can live with this approach.
> I suggest to close ISSUE-187.
> ----------------------------------
> ISSUE-190: Sites with multiple first parties
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/190
>
> Roy has proposed changes as response to ACTION-328 and (unless there 
> are objections), I suggest to implement the changes suggested:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Nov/0004.html
>
> -----------------------------------
> ISSUE-173: The TPE uses "top-level domain" in a sense that is not the 
> normal meaning
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/173
>
> AFAIK, David Singer has introduced the corresponding bug fixes to the 
> spec. This ISSUE has thus been resolved and can be closed.
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 21:14:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:42 UTC