Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (was: Batch closing) from Roy T. Fielding on 2013-04-17 (public-tracking@w3.org from April 2013)

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:03:46 -0700
To: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-Id: <DA11D3FC-7C01-4BF7-B0D1-FFF20BBDC626@gbiv.com>

> On 12/04/2013 17:03, David Wainberg wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>> 
>> On 161, the "!" signal, while we do seem to have consensus on the signal, I do not believe we have reached consensus on the precise meaning or the language describing it in the spec. Therefore, the issue should remain open.
>> 
>> -David

I believe that David's concerns have been fully addressed in the
editors' draft.  Jonathan's have not because they cannot be
addressed in a protocol (only in some legal or regulatory framework
which is not our concern).

....Roy

Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 06:04:11 UTC