W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September

From: イアンフェッティ <ifette@google.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:40:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF4kx8dF6JCYUVWdkr8Mzdr5Oka6DJRUJ-0dbAgnLgsvAeahwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Justin's text much more closely captures my intent. Thank you for putting
it out there Justin.
On Sep 28, 2012 9:00 PM, "Justin Brookman" <jbrookman@cdt.org> wrote:

> **
> I would expand Option 1 to say (something like):
>
> Operators MAY retain data related to a communication in a third-party
> context for up to 6 weeks. During this time, operators may render data
> unlinkable (as described above), perform processing of the data for any of
> the other permitted uses, or perform any other processing that does not
> result in the transfer of information related to the particular user or
> communication to a third party, or alteration of the user's individual
> experience.
>
> (I believe this is more consistent with Ian's original formulation, though
> it's possible he has since changed his mind.  Obviously, as David Wainburg
> points out, this language is contingent upon the scope permitted uses and
> the definition of whatever replaces unlinkable.)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Aleecia M. McDonald [mailto:aleecia@aleecia.com]
> *To:* public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) [mailto:
> public-tracking@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:20:57 -0500
> *Subject:* Poll text call: final text by 28 September
>
> From the call on 12 September, we discussed topics where we have
> increasing clarity on options for permitted uses. I want to make sure we
> have the text right to reflect our options prior to doing a decision
> process with a poll calling for objections, which is responsive to Ian's
> feedback. We also want to move quickly, as Roy suggests.
>
> Please propose specific alternative text if you believe that the two texts
> given below do not reflect the options before us by Friday, 28 September.
> We will briefly review these texts on the call tomorrow, just to make sure
> no one misses anything, and here we are on the mailing list, for those who
> cannot make the call.
>
> Aleecia
>
> -----
> Log files: issue-134
> ----
>
> This normative text fits into the section on Third Party Compliance,
> subsection 6.1.1.1, Short Term Collection and Use, <
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#short-term>.
> We will also want non-normative text, and have some suggested, but that
> will be clearer once we have the normative text settled. (Options for
> definitions of unlinkable data are in section 3.6, Unlinkable Data, <
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#def-unlinkable
> >.)
>
> Option 1:
> Operators MAY retain data related to a communication in a third-party
> context for up to 6 weeks. During this time, operators may render data
> unlinkable (as described above) or perform processing of the data for any
> of the other permitted uses.
>
> Option 2:
> Operators MAY retain data related to a communication in a third-party
> context. They MUST provide public transparency of their data retention
> period, which MUST have a specific time period (e.g. not infinite or
> indefinite.) During this time, operators may render data unlinkable (as
> described above) or perform processing of the data for any of the other
> permitted uses.
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 29 September 2012 15:40:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:34 UTC