W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

Re: ISSUE-161: proposal for transparent non-compliance

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:31:59 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Message-ID: <7838335.gjIlipcINu@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
Jonathan, 

Roy has suggested what is the <test> element in P3P. You really want 
that if you want to preserve the semantics of our protocol. And the 
pseudo compliance doesn't work either as the server sends "P"or 
"test" back. The UA knows. It is transparent. I don't understand 
your objection. 

Rigo

On Thursday 13 September 2012 20:13:51 Jonathan Mayer wrote:
> I strongly object to the Do Not Track protocol facilitating
> noncompliance with the Do Not Track compliance policy.  We've
> addressed this topic a number of times now; it appears I'm far
> from alone in my concerns.
> 
> I'm uncertain why Roy thought there might be "no objections."
Received on Sunday, 16 September 2012 20:32:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:34 UTC