W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

Re: ISSUE-161: proposal for transparent non-compliance

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:09:44 -0700
Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E82E1428-8510-4AE1-87CE-7DB429D1408D@gbiv.com>
To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
On Sep 13, 2012, at 8:13 PM, Jonathan Mayer wrote:

> I strongly object to the Do Not Track protocol facilitating noncompliance with the Do Not Track compliance policy.  We've addressed this topic a number of times now; it appears I'm far from alone in my concerns.

It appears you are completely alone in your concerns.  What are they?

> I'm uncertain why Roy thought there might be "no objections."

I said "If there are no objections, ..."

In other words, this is your opportunity to explain your objections,
in writing, so they can be subject to adequate review.  If you do
not do so now, you will have an additional opportunity to do so when
the draft text is reviewed.  If you do choose to record objections,
then it won't go in the editor's draft until after the WG makes a
formal decision (if ever).

....Roy
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 18:10:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:34 UTC