W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose

From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:58:45 -0400
Message-Id: <37E7B35F-BEAF-4A90-AF19-B5E6A70F62BB@cdt.org>
Cc: "rob@blaeu.com" <rob@blaeu.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Dobbs, Brooks" <brooks.dobbs@kbmg.com>
To: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>
Thanks for facilitating that, Chris... it's not so much concerns as my sometimes fetishism with details and the nitty-gritty... if this isn't available, them's the breaks. ::)

best, Joe

--
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Senior Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
https://www.cdt.org/

On Oct 29, 2012, at 15:09, Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
> 
> I'm not saying it shouldn't be explored if you have concerns-- I just
> think it would be more productive to explore it with the MRC directly, as
> it's their standard.  I'm trying to facilitate an exchange with MRC for
> this working group, but I'd also encourage you to contact them directly
> with your questions and concerns.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Chris
> 
> Chris Mejia | Digital Supply Chain Solutions | Ad Technology Group |
> Interactive Advertising Bureau - IAB
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/29/12 2:09 PM, "Joseph Lorenzo Hall" <joe@cdt.org> wrote:
> 
>> You can imagine how it's hard to accommodate something for which we
>> don't have a good working example. best, Joe
>> 
>> On 10/29/12 11:55 AM, Chris Mejia wrote:
>>> Hi Joe,
>>> 
>>> Good speaking with you the other day.  I think you are headed in the
>>> right
>>> direction here, but unfortunately, these audit reports are very
>>> sensitive-- as they go into granular detail, exposing exact methods,
>>> practices and trade secrets that are confidential and sensitive to the
>>> audited party, and thus are only shared with between the audited party,
>>> the 3rd party auditor, and the MRC in the strictest of confidence.  That
>>> stated, there may very well be something that can be shared to benefit
>>> this group, I just don't know what it would be, so I'd defer that
>>> question
>>> to the MRC itself.
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> Chris Mejia | Digital Supply Chain Solutions | Ad Technology Group |
>>> Interactive Advertising Bureau - IAB
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10/26/12 5:09 PM, "Joseph Lorenzo Hall" <joe@cdt.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Something that would be particularly valuable to methodologists like
>>>> myself would be if there were an MRC/audit/whatever report that could
>>>> be shared with this group in full (they presumably have a lot of
>>>> proprietary and confidential information, no?). Such a thing may not be
>>>> possible but it sounds like the independence of the MRC in ensuring ad
>>>> quality is an important part of the ad side of this. best, Joe
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Joseph Lorenzo Hall
>>>> Senior Staff Technologist
>>>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>>>> 1634 I ST NW STE 1100
>>>> Washington DC 20006-4011
>>>> (p) 202-407-8825
>>>> (f) 202-637-0968
>>>> joe@cdt.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Joseph Lorenzo Hall
>> Senior Staff Technologist
>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>> 1634 I ST NW STE 1100
>> Washington DC 20006-4011
>> (p) 202-407-8825
>> (f) 202-637-0968
>> joe@cdt.org
>> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 15:03:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:37 UTC