W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?

From: Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:12:24 +0200
To: Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CC948CA6.2B9A3%blsaws@gmail.com>
To be clear, I am proposing three new issues be raised and I will propose
text for:
1) Clarify that multiple users may use a specific device/user-agent
2) Address TPE changes to refect multi-user/shared device use cases
3) Update user agent definition to include proxy user agents

On 10/5/12 10:41 AM, "Bryan Sullivan" <blsaws@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> Bryan and W3C Staff,
>>
>> How do you take a perspective like this and turn this into an
>>actionable item within the Working Group?  Open an issue?  Curious to
>>understand how to handle something like this procedurally.
>>
>
>Re actionable suggestions:
>
>1) Update "3.1 User" definition to better reflect the broader meaning:
>"A user is an individual human. When user-agent software accesses
>online resources, whether or not the user who invoked the action
>understands or has specific knowledge of a particular request, that
>request is made "by" the user."
>
>Explanation: "who invoked the action" makes it clearer that the user
>is distinct from the device/user-agent, that multiple users may
>invoked actions via a user agent, and that we need to consider the
>goals of Tracking Protection in that context.
>
>2) Text related to (1) in the TPE, focusing on how TPE works in
>multiuser/shared devices.
>
>3) Update "3.2 User Agent": "This specification uses the term user
>agent to refer to any of the various client programs capable of
>initiating HTTP requests, including but not limited to browsers,
>spiders (web-based robots), command-line tools, native applications,
>mobile apps, and intermediaries such as proxies acting on the user's
>behalf [HTTP11]."
>
>4) The concern over the weaknesses in the TCS are more intractable
>IMO, and I will think about what to propose next.
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 11:12:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:35 UTC