W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: f2f wrap up & next steps

From: Peter Cranstone <peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:04:32 -0600
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CC0F8D21.4504%peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
Hmmm.

So my question then becomes - if it is NOT missing is there going to be a
CI call at all assuming we have the LC in June, and assuming that we've
reached CR by August.

Have the entrance steps already been met for CR? (not sure how this can be
if we haven't had LC (which I may have missed))


Peter
___________________________________
Peter J. Cranstone
720.663.1752








-----Original Message-----
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 3:56 PM
To: Peter Cranstone <peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
Cc: W3 Tracking <public-tracking@w3.org>
Subject: Re: f2f wrap up & next steps

>* Peter Cranstone wrote:
>>Quick question.
>>
>>I was reviewing the timeline at:
>>http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/
>>
>>And noticed that Call for Implementations was missing (see this link:
>>http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr)
>>
>>Are we skipping this and going straight for CR (Call for Review of a
>>Proposed Spec)? 
>
>W3C issues a "Call for Implementations" when a document is advanced to
>"Candidate Recommendation" status, so this is not missing from the time-
>line, it just specifies only the document maturity levels. A "Call for
>Review of a Proposed Recommendation" would come when the document is ad-
>vanced to "Proposed Recommendation" status.
>-- 
>Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
>25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 22:05:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:31 UTC