W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance

From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:00:31 -0700
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>
CC: Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Ninja Marnau <nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <63294A1959410048A33AEE161379C8023D185908E0@SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com>

The user has many options at that point:
- Switch to a compliant UA and set DNT
- Use the existing opt-out approach
- Block cookies (in whole or selectively)
- Stop viewing the free content provided on that site

What signifies consent in your view today in the absence of a DNT standard?

- Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11:57 AM
To: Tamir Israel
Cc: Shane Wiley; Jeffrey Chester; Ninja Marnau; ifette@google.com; Bjoern Hoehrmann; David Singer; public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance

On Friday 08 June 2012 14:49:23 Tamir Israel wrote:
> I truly apologize for belaboring this issue, but once the DNT-1
> signal  is ignored, there is no longer an available opt-out
> mechanism for the user to employ in order to express their
> preference. So regulators will then have to decide whether the
> mere presence of notice that tracking is occurring offers a
> sufficiently meaningful consent mechanism.

You found the hole! I have to think about it.

Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 19:01:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:50 UTC