W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ACTION-169 Done

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:28:40 +0200
To: Tom Lowenthal <tom@mozilla.com>
Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
Message-ID: <3650301.SiGDOoBcHF@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
Ok, 

I will try to figure out where it fits into the compliance 
specification. Who is editor of the compliance specification 
currently and what is the backlog?

Rigo

On Thursday 07 June 2012 13:35:12 Tom Lowenthal wrote:
> Agreed. If at all possible, we should try to express what happens
> on the wire in the TPE and what that means in the TCS.
> 
> On 06/07/2012 09:37 AM, David Singer wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I don't mind doing the edit, but I rather think that the
> > definition of what the requirements are for multiple sites to
> > be considered a single party belongs in the compliance
> > specification, doesn't it?> 
> > On Jun 7, 2012, at 0:34 , Rigo Wenning wrote:
> >> Hi Aleecia,
> >> 
> >> for Action-169
> >> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/16
> >> 9
> >> 
> >> I created the text on 4 May:
> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-
> >> tracking/2012May/0056.html
> >> 
> >> There was no opposition to it. So can you set it to Done?
> >> 
> >> This is now pending inclusion into the Specification. David
> >> could you upon approval from Aleecia?
> >> 
> >> Rigo
> > 
> > David Singer
> > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 08:29:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:30 UTC