W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking-comments@w3.org > June 2015

Re: registering headers and well-known Fwd: DNT Last Call review

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:01:14 +1000
Cc: public-tracking-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <FFB663F0-0DCC-4CB5-BBE5-6A0A1011C66F@mnot.net>
To: Nick Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
Thanks. Note that I'm not the expert for that registry; Graham Klyne is. See:
  http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/message-headers.xhtml

Cheers,


> On 10 Jun 2015, at 8:31 am, Nick Doty <npdoty@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Thank you for your comments (last June) on the TPE Last Call Working Draft. The Tracking Protection Working Group has discussed each of the issues and proposed resolutions.
> 
> Editor Roy Fielding has provided summaries of the responses in each of the tracker issues for the Last Call product; I have provided links below. I would briefly summarize the resolutions as:
> * the plan is to register header fields and .well-known at CR (soon)
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/267
> 
> Please let us know if these changes or explanations resolve your concerns.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick Doty, W3C (for the Tracking Protection Working Group)
> 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking-comments/2014Oct/0000.html
> 
>> On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Forwarding with permission.
>> 
>> (This comment came in a long time ago, but I just realized that it wasn't forwarded to the publicly-archived list. Apologies  npd)
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
>>> Subject: Re: DNT Last Call review
>>> Date: June 22, 2014 at 8:30:44 PM PDT
>>> Hi Nicholas,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the heads up. I'm CC:ing in Julian, as he may have additional comments.
>>> 
>>> I took a quick look at <http://www.w3.org/TR/tracking-dnt/> and the specification text looks good to me (although Julian may feel differently about the ABNF).
>>> 
>>> One thing that does seem to be missing, however, is registrations for the DNT and Tk header fields (as per RFC3986) as well as the dnt well-known URI (as per RFC5795). If you're going to use these, they need to be registered.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 00:01:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 10 June 2015 00:01:43 UTC