- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:02:42 +0200
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Silvia Pfieffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > On 24/09/2015 00:06, "singer@apple.com on behalf of David Singer" > <singer@apple.com> wrote: > >>I’m fine with >>* moving to more modern pub tools (Echidna) >>* using Github issues rather than Bugzilla (even though I find github >>issues/bug/conversations much harder to follow) >>* moving to github and away from e.g. CVS >> >>It does seem…odd…to be in the whatwg part of github and not the general >>W3C part. Not sure I follow this. > > +1. It's confusing and unhelpful. I am no longer one of the editors, but I definitely support hosting WebVTT at the WHATWG. Both because of saner infrastructure (the dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/ setup involved PhantomJS and CVS on my private VPS) and because the text track model which WebVTT extends is part of HTML, maintained by the WHATWG. Philip
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 09:03:11 UTC