- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 16:09:48 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Victor Carbune <victor.carbune@gmail.com>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer >> <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am prepared to change the rendering section / algorithm completely. >>> >>> But I am not prepared to change the Syntax any more. It's been too >>> long in the making. >>> >>> That's really the core of my position. And it's not about CEA608, but >>> about CEA708. >>> For 608 I agree that we wouldn't need regions at all. >> >> Then it seems we are at an impasse. I am not interested in maintaining >> regions as currently specified, and even less interested in big >> changes to the rendering algorithm, unless they bring regions and >> non-regions closer together in some meaningful way. > > Yes, the latter was exactly the plan: bring the rendering of regions > and non-regions closer together. And I was under the impression that > we made progress on that. There's been a lot of brainstorming in this thread and I'm not sure which ideas are still on the table: * Using an anonymous region for the entire video viewport * Using regions for absolute positioning Are there others? Which of them would you like to move forward with? Philip
Received on Monday, 5 May 2014 14:10:17 UTC