- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:19:24 +1000
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
Hi Glenn, The move towards the ReSpec is on purpose - it's the baseline for CG specs. I can, however, make improvements - and including proper references was indeed one of the things I wanted to improve. Do register bugs so we can keep track of these changes. Thanks, Silvia. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > Also, references no longer work; I can't click "WebVTT cue" and get a list > of where that term is used. > > Seems like something bad happened to the spec between the Apr 5 and Apr 26 > snapshots. > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: >> >> At some point, the styling of the spec took a big turn for the worse. >> Before: >> >> >> http://web.archive.org/web/20130112213206/http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/#syntax >> >> Now: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/#the-webvtt-file-format >> >> The links are no longer colored, and lists are now single-spaced instead >> of double-spaced. There may be other details causing readability problems, >> but overall the spec is now a headache to read. Please restore the >> formatting used by the HTML spec. >> >> -- >> Glenn Maynard >> > > > > -- > Glenn Maynard >
Received on Saturday, 15 June 2013 12:20:11 UTC