- From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:14:43 +0100
- To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- CC: Dzenana Trenutak <dzenana.trenutak@gmail.com>, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, b.lund@cablelabs.com, peter.linss@hp.com, rhauck@adobe.com, lmcliste@adobe.com, bs3131@att.com, yfuna@tomo-digi.co.jp, public-test-infra@w3.org
On 02/28/2013 02:11 PM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote: >> I just began submitting tests this winter myself, and as of only a few days >> ago joined as an invited expert/member of the html testsuite task force to >> boot, so if I've misunderstood anything about W3C's >> processes/preferences/priorities, set me straight and I'm happy to make >> corrections. >> >> Also, I just clued into the existence/relevance of the IDLHarness testing >> mechanism, which is quite a missing link for this tutorial (and probably >> for my previously submitted pull requests, too). So, I'll look into that >> next. I can add to/revise these pages accordingly once I do so. > > Yeah, I think the tests https://github.com/w3c/html-testsuite/pull/21 and > https://github.com/w3c/html-testsuite/pull/18 could be rewritten using > IDLHarness. (Not saying that they must be, just that they could be.) Some of the assertions could be, yes. Definitely not all of them. Ms2ger
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 13:15:18 UTC