W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Testing Web IDL Usage

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:00:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+eVA6-AULQUbYpwZzdS3QTDGaA1A-C5uOiyGahbfkEvVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 07/12/2012 17:32 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
>> Note that idlharness.js is not complete yet but does cover several parts
>> of the specification. If you have any questions/comments/etc. about
>> idlharness or your document uses a feature not yet supported by
>> idlharness, please use the following list:
>>
>> public-test-infra@w3.org (archive [4])
>>
>
> Note that I've been porting idlharness to use WebIDL2.js, which supports
> WebIDL as it is today (or at least, it is believed to).
>
> I've only performed the more cursory part of the work so far, but it
> already works at least for the simpler stuff.
>
> If there are specific WebIDL features that you've wanted to test but
> weren't able to due to the limitations in the WebIDL parser that idlharness
> used previously, please let me know and I'll prioritise them for inclusion
> in the new branch.


have you added the features I requested in
https://github.com/darobin/webidl.js/pull/16 ?
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:01:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:01:28 GMT